Company News

In the field of injection molds, the design of cooling channels is undergoing a process transformation from "straight" to "conformal." Traditional molds rely on drill bits to bore straight cooling holes into a metal block. Limited by the tool path, the channels cannot follow complex cavity surfaces, resulting in uneven mold surface temperatures—areas far from the channels form "hot spots" and cool slowly, while areas close to the channels cool quickly, causing inconsistent product shrinkage. Conformal cooling channels enabled by 3D printing (additive manufacturing) are now systematically solving this problem.

Conformal cooling channels leverage the layer-by-layer stacking characteristic of metal 3D printing to create arbitrarily curved three-dimensional cooling passages. During design, the channels can be positioned at a uniform distance along the cavity surface, essentially wrapping the product in a "water-cooling blanket." The practical benefits of this design freedom have been validated in multiple cases: after a home appliance panel mold adopted conformal cooling, cooling time dropped from 32 seconds with traditional channels to 18 seconds, a 22% reduction in cycle time; product warpage fell from 0.8 mm to 0.25 mm. In 3C product molds, the cavity surface temperature differential can be narrowed from 18°C to 4°C, with warpage reduced from 0.35 mm to 0.06 mm. Other cases show cooling time reductions ranging from 28.7% to 40%.

However, the manufacturing cost of conformal cooling molds remains 3 to 5 times that of traditional methods, typically requiring 6 to 18 months to recover the investment through shortened cycle times and improved yield rates. In addition, the inner walls of metal-printed channels are relatively rough (Ra approximately 6–15 μm, compared with 0.4–1.6 μm for traditional drilling), typically requiring electrochemical polishing to reduce flow resistance, otherwise cooling effectiveness is affected.

Industry analysis suggests that traditional channels solve the problem of "whether cooling exists," while 3D-printed conformal channels solve the problem of "whether cooling is uniform and fast enough." For molds with deep cavities, thin walls, and high appearance requirements, this difference is often decisive. As metal printing costs and post-processing techniques continue to optimize, conformal cooling is moving from an "optional feature" for high-end molds toward a "standard configuration" in more injection molding scenarios.